Metaphysical Meanderings

ICMOR

Deliberate Creating, a Fine Art?

Energy work/healing

Body Stuff

The Idea of Lessons

Let's Talk About Forks, Baby

Challenge: What to do when the sh!t hits the fan

Challenge Part Two: Priorities

a little Elias stuff

a little Bashar stuff

A Metaphysical Workshop Story

Melchizedek: A Research Story and Ponderings

Relationship

The Dark and the Light

~

expanded journey

ICMOR

Relationship

About 15 years ago there was a woman on Delphi (back when the internet was only text!) who was in a bisexual, polyamorous relationship with five other adults. Some of them had children, and the children benefitted from having more than just one or two parents available. She said the nicest thing about it was that some of the adults travelled for their work, and having that many people in the relationship meant that there was always somebody there if you wanted company. (Or the kids needed help with their homework, or just wanted some attention.) It sounded like the ideal scenario to me and made so much sense that I didn't understand why that wasn't the "norm".

She was careful to warn people that if they were insecure, this was not the type of relationship for them-- jealousy had no place there. I wondered, how could a person be jealous if they had the attentions and affections of that many people?? Who would have time to be jealous?? And of course that brings up one of the most appealing things about the scenario to me, because I like to spend time by myself-- if a lover wanted some attention and I felt like being alone, there would be someone else there that they could hang out with. Very ideal!

The other day I was reading a channeling by Sasha through Lyssa Royal talking about Pleiadian relationships and I enjoyed it immensely, reminding myself why I so often enjoy the channeled material more than many of our own stories here in this physical arena. It is on the second half of the transcript that contains information from a group consciousness called Germane (through same channel) that outlined some of the characteristics of third-density and fourth-density relationships. Many of the extra-terrestrial/ other-dimensional/ fourth-density relationships were based on respect, natural timing, freedom, and inner security, and included bisexuality and polyamory as "normal" options.

After I read that I thought sheesh, no wonder I felt like such an alien here! I naturally fit more along those lines. Many times here we have unnatural structure, rules, and drama around relationships that I have never been able to understand. Once again, another exploration in anthropology, sociology, and psychology. What makes people stay in relationships they are not thrilled with? A big societal rule that says ye must? People are not the same from year to year, decade to decade, and with all due respect for the ones who grow separately and also together, still finding a common ground-- many people don't. Of course that is reflected by the large numbers of divorces now-days yet people seem to see that as a failure instead of just another phase of growth, of getting to know themselves better and honoring & enjoying who they are. We create wars and battles over ending relationships instead of just moving on.

And frankly I have never been able to understand making a person's parts more important than who they are, meaning choosing partners because they are male or female instead of who they are inside. Evidently I'm in the minority on this one but that's no surprise. :p

Anyway so, relationships in the new paradigm-- it makes sense to me that as we become more comfortable in our expansion and our relationships with ourselves that we would also be moving in the direction of a higher likelihood of expanded relationships with others, possibly several others. If we are more likely to be balanced within and not needing that anima/ animus "other half" in front of our faces then it also makes more sense there would be more bisexual and homosexual relationships.

One of the more curious ideas is that our relationships are about our relationship with ourselves anyway. I have been in poly relationships before and I like the idea of interacting with multiple aspects, though I have had challenge feeling "not enough" with a single person, and don't even want to imagine that multiplied.

Some food for thought: Bashar said rather than being a person that is doing something, or a person who is experiencing something being done to him/ her, we are actually the interaction itself.



2007 Beth Shearon